Tue, 8 September 2026
Regulation25 July 2026

Brussels puts fourteen crypto platforms on the sanctions list

The EU's 21st sanctions package, adopted on 23 July, targets crypto services outside Russia for the first time: in Georgia, Panama, the UAE, the Marshall Islands, Kyrgyzstan and Belarus. It also introduces a new instrument allowing Brussels to ban crypto services from an entire third country.

Article image for: Brussels puts fourteen crypto platforms on the sanctions list

The European Union's 21st sanctions package was adopted on 23 July 2026 and entered into force the same day. It is the largest package so far, but for the crypto market the striking part is its direction: this time Brussels barely targets Russian platforms themselves, and focuses almost entirely on the detour routes around them.

Fourteen platforms, six countries

The list names fourteen crypto service providers based in Georgia, Panama, the United Arab Emirates, the Marshall Islands, Kyrgyzstan and Belarus. None of those countries is Russia. The designated names include HTX (formerly Huobi Global), EXMO, BitPapa, Rapira, Exnode, Aifory Pro, ABCeX, WhiteBird, NoOnecrypto, Tradex, Monease, PilotFinance and two entities from the so-called A7 network with operations in Africa.

The logic is that of a transit port. Sanctioning a Russian exchange moves the problem one border further along; sanctioning the platform in Tbilisi or Bishkek hits the place where money actually converts from roubles into a stablecoin and back again.

The new weapon: a country-wide ban

Legally, the most far-reaching element is a new instrument that lets the EU ban crypto services originating from an entire third country, rather than working platform by platform. The European Commission explicitly describes it as a deterrent to countries that systematically host sanctions-evasion infrastructure.

In practice this changes something fundamental for European providers. An authorised exchange will not only have to tick off a list of names, but also assess, jurisdiction by jurisdiction, whether transactions to that country are still permitted. That is a different and far broader compliance question than screening individual counterparties.

More than a hundred financial institutions

Beyond crypto, the package hits 94 banks and financial institutions with asset freezes, plus 33 additional Russian credit and financial institutions brought under a transaction ban. A Kyrgyz bank connected to the Russian payment network SPFS and three non-Russian banks have also been designated for facilitating evasion.

In total, 218 new listings were added: 48 individuals and 170 entities. Kaja Kallas, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, summed it up as: 'We're hitting over a hundred banks and crypto operators, 40+ vessels in Russia's shadow fleet, and several oil refineries.'

The automatic adjustment mechanism for the oil price cap, currently set at USD 44 (approx. €38.50) per barrel, has been paused until 15 July 2027, with an interim review to assess whether it remains necessary and proportionate.

Why enforcement stays hard

Analytics firm TRM Labs points to a practical problem. The designated platforms rotate their deposit addresses continuously, and do so across several blockchains at once. A static list of wallet addresses is therefore out of date within days. TRM advises compliance teams to screen not only direct counterparties but also successor infrastructure and indirect exposure within one to two transaction hops.

CoinDesk described the whole as a network estimated to carry around USD 120 billion (approx. €105 billion). That is an estimate rather than a confirmed figure, but it does indicate the order of magnitude supervisors are dealing with.

What it means for you

For a retail user in the Netherlands, Belgium or France, nothing changes legally about owning crypto. What does change is the friction around it. Expect authorised European platforms to ask sharper questions about the origin of deposits, to refuse more transfers to and from exchanges in the countries named, and to take longer processing withdrawals to external wallets.

Very practically: if you still hold a balance at one of the fourteen platforms listed, assume European banks and exchanges will start blocking transactions coming from there. Waiting for it to resolve itself is rarely a good strategy in cases like this.

Sources: Council of the European Union (press release, 23 July 2026), TRM Labs, Chainalysis, Mayer Brown, Euromaidan Press. Last checked: 25 July 2026.

#regulatie#eu#sancties#exchange#compliance